| IV) |
Non-regulatory steps – in advance of legislation the matter of taxation is
capable of being addressed.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| I) |
Prohibition on Internet Gaming Sites in GB – commercial gaming on Internet
would require primary legislation to make it a feasible proposition.
|
| |
|
| II) |
Urgency of Action – Internet development is proceeding an incredible pace
therefore action should be urgent.
|
| |
|
| III) |
Arguments for Permitting Play from Overseas – British regulation would be
held in high enough regard for it to satisfy worldwide criteria.
|
| |
|
| IV) |
Non-regulatory Steps – Operators can be planning their strategy and product
offerings in anticipation of changes in legislation.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| I) |
Legislation – primary legislation would be required for UK
|
| |
|
| II) |
Urgency – the need for enabling action is overwhelming. The rate of
investment into on-line gaming is growing daily.
|
| |
|
| III) |
It is in the interests of Government and industry to use the British gaming
industry's well known reputation for being well regulated to its advantage.
|
| |
|
| IV) |
The pressure to establish operations offshore is increasing rapidly and it
seems there will be a move in this direction in the absence of positive
enabling legislation in the UK.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| I) |
Rapid growth is forecast for online gaming. It is important for careful
consideration to be given to the legislative framework surrounding Internet
gaming.
|
| |
|
| II) |
The boundaries of the law may be tested very soon and force legislative
change.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| I) |
Legislation – it would be preferable not to assume legislation, and suggest
this might be achievable through a Code of Practice or Guidelines.
|
| |
|
| II) |
Urgency – it will be to everyone's loss if we do not move quickly.
|