|
Internet Gambling Report in Various Jurisdictions
| |
worldwide. Even if thought desirable, it does not seem that it would be feasible to
prevent British residents accessing the supply of such gambling. It seems better
therefore to permit sites offering such gambling to be established in Great Britain.
That would allow proper regulation and control and allow British operations the
chance to share in the opportunities available.
|
| |
|
| 22. |
Under this option, legislation would be needed to permit the certification/licensing of
Internet casinos (and other gaming operations) based in Britain. The Board would
then, as it does for conventional casinos, take responsibility for ensuring that all those
granted a certificate are, and remain, fit and proper and have the financial wherewithal
to operate the gaming. This is familiar territory for the Board and it does not envisage
that it will present it with any special problems.
|
| |
|
| 23. |
Less familiar to the Board will be the need both to test the software on the site to
ensure that the gaming is fairly conducted (and therefore that players are not misled or
cheated in any way) and to ensure a proper audit trail for all monies which flow
through the site (in order to guarantee protection for stakes and winnings and to
monitor any suspicious activity which might suggest attempts at money laundering).
There are already commercial organisations elsewhere with the relevant expertise to
conduct such testing and the Board would need to buy in this expertise. There would
be resource costs but they could be recovered through fees paid by the certificated
operators. One suggestion is that, once certificated, sites could carry a Board stamp of
approval. Alternatively, and perhaps better, all certificated sites might be listed on a
Board "portal" web site, which would give access to them and would avoid fraudulent
use of the stamp of approval. In either case, the Board would need to monitor
certificated sites to ensure that they continued to meet required standards.
|
| |
|
| 24. |
If this option is to be pursued, there are a range of related issues which would need
resolution and the Board's views on these are as follows.
|
| |
|
| (a) |
The Board believes that certificated sites should not in principle be prevented from
offering gaming to those resident abroad and therefore should not, as in some
jurisdictions, be required to limit gaming just to domestic residents. The market is a
global one and there do not seem to be any strong reasons why British operations >>
|
|