|
Internet Gambling Report in Various Jurisdictions
| |
offending sites are unlikely to be as easily identifiable, because many sites with
references to gambling are informational. Any scheme to block Internet gambling
sites is likely therefore to be unwieldy, costly and only partially effective.
|
| |
|
| 18. |
The Association for Payment Clearing Services has told the Board that it is not easy to
identify the exact nature of accounts to which credit card payments are to be made
and therefore those which are gambling sites. Further, banks here would find it
extremely difficult, if not impossible, to refuse to honour payments to overseas
accounts which had been properly established within those countries and related to
trading operations which were legitimate there. Often, gambling sites require money
to be deposited before play and the purposes of the deposit may not be obvious to the
banks. In some cases, the deposits may be set up in such a way that they can be used
for more than one purpose.
|
| |
|
| 19. |
Whatever the exact position in respect of the possibilities of preventing access to
offshore Internet gambling sites ¡V and this will doubtless change over time as
technology develops - the Board on the basis of its current knowledge does not
believe that attempts at prohibition are either sensible or likely to be successful. Past
experience suggests that where there is a substantial market for a good or a service
which cannot be met legitimately, illegal supply will occur instead. This will be so
particularly where the general population feels there to be little wrong with the
activity. In any case, it would make little sense for legislation to prevent offshore
gambling without also addressing the inherent inconsistencies in the laws relating to
domestic Internet sites, in particular the contrast between betting which is permitted
and gaming which is not.
|
| |
|
| 20. |
In summary, the Board does not support this option in itself. As explained later, a
variant could be considered as an adjunct to option (iii) although the Board does not
find that attractive either.
|
| |
|
| Option (iii): Legislate to permit, regulate and tax |
| |
|
| 21. |
This is the Board's preferred option. It was also supported by nearly all respondents to
the Board's consultation paper. It seems clear that there is likely to be a substantial,
and possibly massive, market for Internet gambling, both domestically and >>
|
|