-
Some clients thrive on the vagaries and complexities of the status quo.
-
All would condemn any attempt to prohibit the use of the Internet for
gambling.
-
Supports legalisation and regulation of Internet gambling sites.
-
Sees the Gaming Board as being the licensing body and regulator for internet
gambling for Britain.
-
Legislation is needed to safeguard against excess, under-age play and
overseas play.
-
Legislation will not control the technology.
-
The pragmatic approach is the most realistic.
-
Legislation seems the best option.
-
Gambling revenues and taxes shouldn't go to other countries while Britain
bears the social costs.
-
Would prefer a prevention policy if sustainable.
-
Shouldn't be rushed into legalising internet gambling, we should be cautious.
-
Regulation offers the virtual guarantee that the games will be honest.
-
It is better to be inside a regulated arrangement than to endeavour to counter
every move made by offshore providers.
-
Maintaining the status quo would ignore the breath taking growth of the
information super highway.
-
Prevention, as the USA are trying to do, would prove impossible.
-
We must accept progress and ensure the UK provides a regulated and
controlled gaming facility.
-
Attempts to prohibit Internet gambling would be futile and counterproductive.
-
UK firms should be allowed to compete in the global market.
-
Firms should be licensed by Board, have insurance and bonds.
-
The Board should investigate the BSI model.
-
Favour the level playing field approach to internet gambling, i.e. legalisation
-
Gambling within Britain should be subject to social law & tax arrangements