Print this page <<Page - 54>>
 

Internet Gambling Report in Various Jurisdictions

ANNEX B

THE FOLLOWING ARE EXTENTS OF THE TYPES OF RESPONSES
FROM RESPONDENTS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS

  • The Internet is part of a technical revolution, in an embryonic stage of development.

  • Current legislation is inadequate and imprecise. Internet gambling is an international issue, yet there is little international legislation.

  • Problems of Internet gambling are: I) Possibilities of under age gambling, and/or excessive play. II) Potential credit card fraud. III) Lack of guarantee that the gaming will be fairly conducted.

  • Retaining the Status Quo would be without merit.

  • No evidence that prevention will eradicate or control Internet gaming. It would be impossible to have any preventative legislation which will be effective to block activities.

  • Supports legislation to permit regulated access. Any regulation has to recognize that it seeks to regulate a communication tool.

  • The status quo is unsustainable in anything other than the short term.

  • Prevention of Internet Gambling is not feasible.

  • Legislation to permit, regulate and tax Internet Gambling, whilst complex, is the most attractive way forward.

  • The Government should move to legislate Internet gambling to enable British bookmakers to compete with off-shore challenge.

  • Maintaining the status quo, and effectively doing nothing is no longer an option.

  • If things are left as they are there is a danger of Internet Gaming taking a sizeable chunk out of existing UK gambling business.

  • Prevention is not a viable option. It does not remove the presence of Internet gambling activities ¡V which would remain a competitive threat.

 
Copyright © intelligentpolicy.com. All rights reserved.